Kaleidos Moon Cruiser House Age Highlighter ($14.00 for 0.10 oz.) has a translucent base with duochrome shifting shimmer and faint sparkle that went from icy blue to cooler to barely hotter lavender. It had a really wet-look when utilized to reveal pores and skin, because it was shiny and twinkling. It had medium, buildable pigmentation that utilized evenly to reveal pores and skin and blended out pretty properly, although I discovered it was extra vulnerable to caking up in opposition to medium protection basis so I’d advocate making use of over set basis.
The feel was firmer, barely stiff within the pan, however I used to be in a position to decide it up with a moderately-dense blush brush with out an excessive amount of effort. It lasted properly for eight hours earlier than fading visibly.
FURTHER READING:
Method Overview
for particulars on normal efficiency and traits (like scent).
- Cowl FX Halo (P, $42.00) is much less shimmery, darker (90% related).
- Deadly Cosmetics Stellar (P, $18.00) is darker, hotter (90% related).
- Huda Magnificence Arctic Glow (LE, ) is darker (90% related).
- City Decay Bare Cherry #3 (LE, ) is much less shimmery, hotter (90% related).
- Anastasia Blue Ice (LE, ) is extra shimmery, cooler (90% related).
- Dior Pearlescent Glow (03) (P, $48.00) is hotter (90% related).
- Milani Make Imagine (PiP, ) is darker, hotter (90% related).
- JD Glow Synopsis (P, $16.50) is extra shimmery, darker, hotter (90% related).
- Dior Holographic Glow (006) (P, $50.00) is much less shimmery (90% related).
- Moist ‘n’ Wild White Raven (LE, $4.99) is lighter (90% related).
Method Overview
$14.00/0.1 oz. – $140.00 Per Ounce
The method is meant to have “vibrant, color-shifting” shades which have an “ultra-lightweight, clean texture that virtually melts onto pores and skin.” They’re described as being “translucent but spotlight reflective” with a “multi-chrome end.” I had totally different experiences throughout the vary, so it was not probably the most constant of ranges. They did, on common, apply slightly higher in apply than they appeared initially swatched.
For probably the most half, the regularly-priced ($14 on the time of publishing) shades have been extra like intense duochromes than true multi-chromes to me, and I do assume the worth displays that (as their true multichromes are $36 every). That they had translucent bases throughout the board with some shades having stronger preliminary protection than others, however they produced a noticeable sheen and shift on my pores and skin.
The feel was what various from shade to shade with some shades feeling drier, nearly crumbly, and being notably vulnerable to emphasizing pores and skin texture, though I haven’t got that a lot seen texture on my cheeks (this isn’t a typical difficulty for me, it could possibly occur however it’s rare that I actually really feel a highlighter emphasizes my texture!) whereas different shades have been firmer however utilized extra easily on my pores and skin.
I favored the tones and shade vary extra so than the method, however a few shades have been actually beautiful to work with. They tended to put on round eight hours on my pores and skin earlier than fading visibly, although the chunkier, extra sparkly shades had seen migration across the six-hour mark.
Browse all of our Kaleidos House Age Highlighter swatches.
Components
Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate, Talc, Ethylhexyl Palmitate, Octyldodecanol, Artificial Wax, Boron Nitride, Hydrogen Dimethicone, Tin Oxide, Phenoxyethanol, Hydrated Silica, Decylene Glycol, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, PTFE, Titanium Dioxide (CI 77891).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as out there by the model (or retailer)
on the time of publishing. Please all the time test product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient listing relevant
to the product you are buying, or the model or retailer’s web site for probably the most up-to-date ingredient listing.
